avokata
EN
How to connectConnect
Menu

§ 01A connector for your AI assistant

Your AI, with sources from Lithuanian law.

Connect Avokata to Claude or another AI assistant. Each answer shows the article or ruling paragraph, whose words it is and whether the law is in force. Every link leads to a source you can open.

Add Avokata to Claude (opens in a new window) ChatGPT or another assistant

Free during beta · Sign in with your email, no card · We don't store your queries

Works withClaudeChatGPTCursor

Your AI assistant Avokata connected

When can an employee be dismissed for a gross breach of duties? Give the Labour Code article and Supreme Court practice.

  • Avokata· legal acts Found: DK 58 str. · in force since 2017-07-01
  • Avokata· ruling Found: e3K-3-196-313/2022, 30 p. · Indirect citation (another ruling)

The basis is Article 58 of the Labour Code, „Darbo sutarties nutraukimas darbdavio iniciatyva dėl darbuotojo kaltės“ 1, in force since 2017-07-01. The Supreme Court of Lithuania (para. 30): „Atleidimas iš darbo turi būti proporcinga pažeidimui ar jų visumai priemonė.“ 2. Whose words: here the court restates an earlier ruling, so cite it „remiantis Lietuvos Aukščiausiojo Teismo 2018-12-19 nutartimi civilinėje byloje Nr. e3K-3-461-695/2018“ 3.

  1. Source 1: Labour Code, 58 str. · in force
  2. Source 2: LAT, e3K-3-196-313/2022 · 2022-03-30
  3. Source 3: LAT, e3K-3-461-695/2018 · 2018-12-19
Example: how an AI assistant uses Avokata. Recorded on the live service, 19 October 2026; the answer is built from the tool results. All examples

Why Avokata

Without sources an AI answers from memory. With Avokata it first opens the act or the ruling and shows where it is written.

Made in Lithuania

  • Court rulings and decisions

    2,424,400

    anonymised, as the courts published them

    LITEKO · e-TAR

  • Legal acts

    517,035

    Lithuanian and EU

    e-TAR · EUR-Lex

  • Articles and paragraphs

    29,693,843

    each read and cited on its own

    Avokata

  • Linked citations

    1,126,028

    see what cites a ruling or an article

    the citation graph

Updated 2026-11-08 18:17 UTC

An update date does not establish that every document or edition is available. Each source and its date

§ 02Before and after

The same question, a different answer.

AI without Avokata

Sounds convincing

  • May cite a ruling that does not exist, or with the wrong number
  • May present a party's argument as the court's position
  • May rely on an outdated version of a law

AI with Avokata

And it is checkable

  • The case number in the court's own format and a paragraph you can open
  • Each excerpt says whose words it is: the court's, a party's or a lower court's
  • Which version was in force on your date, and which act amended it

§ 03Examples

Ask the way you would ask a colleague.

No special commands. Below are real answers from the live service: what Avokata returned, not what it promises.

“Check this citation: Supreme Court e3K-3-196-313/2022, para. 40 on proving the employee's fault.”

Avokata returned

  • This is a party's argument, not the court's interpretation. (ieškovas)
  • Cited as para. 40; the text is in para. 39.
  • A warning not to cite it as the court's holding

Citation checkWhose words

“Has Article 58 of the Labour Code changed? What changed?”

Avokata returned

  • Amended: Article 58(3)(4) of the Labour Code
  • Amending act No. XIV-1187, adopted 28 June 2022
  • In force from 12 July 2022

Legal actsVersions

“What cites Article 58 of the Labour Code?”

Avokata returned

  • 677 rulings, newest first
  • Newest: Šiaulių apygardos teismas, e2A-336-883/2026, 21 September 2026
  • These are citations, not endorsements: agreement is not recorded

CitatorCourt practice

Or hand over the whole job

12 workflows you make your own

What each returns, step by step

§ 04Confidentiality

What we keep, said precisely.

Your AI provider processes the chat under its own terms. This is what Avokata does.

  • Queries

    The text of the questions and citations your AI passes to Avokata is not stored. We record only that a tool ran, when and how many results came back, and a one-way digest.

  • What we keep

    For the account: the email address and a hash of the key. Your text only when you save or send it yourself: a matter profile, your workflows, followed provisions, feedback.

  • Deletion

    You delete the account and its records with one confirmation. Only call counts remain, with no account and no text. Servers and backups are in Germany (EU).

Privacy policy

§ 05How to connect

Connected in a minute.

0 €while Avokata is in beta; a signed-in account has 1,000 searches a day. We will announce future prices in advance.

Not using Claude?

Add Avokata to ChatGPT (copies the address and opens ChatGPT in a new window)

Connecting

Claude in the browser, on desktop or phone

  1. Press the button. Claude opens its add window with the address filled in.
  2. Confirm "Add", then sign in once with your email: free, no card.
  3. Paste the first task: the answer shows the article, the edition date and the link.
Add Avokata to Claude(opens in a new window)

Then paste the first task in the chat

Use Avokata. Find Article 58 of the Lithuanian Labour Code, read the version in force today and give me: 1) the article's title; 2) the date the applicable version took effect; 3) the link to the Register of Legal Acts. Say separately what you could not check.

or for another assistant

https://mcp.avokata.com/mcp

Steps for each app

§ 06FAQ

Common questions.

What is MCP?

An open way to connect an AI assistant to outside sources. Avokata is such a connector: your assistant gets tools to read legal acts and court practice.

What does Avokata cost?

Free during the beta: nothing is charged. A signed-in account has 1,000 searches a day. Pricing

Which AI assistants does Avokata work with?

Any assistant that supports remote MCP connectors: Claude in the browser, on desktop or phone, ChatGPT, Cursor and others. Steps for each app

Do I need technical knowledge?

No. For Claude, one button and a confirmation. For another assistant, you paste the address into its settings.

Does Avokata store my questions and documents?

We do not store query text: we record that a tool ran, when and how many results came back, and a one-way digest your words cannot be recovered from. We store your text only when you save or send it yourself (a matter profile, workflows, followed provisions, feedback). The chat and any documents you give your AI are processed by your AI provider under its own terms. Privacy policy

Who at Avokata can see matter data?

There is no admin console. Matter profiles and workflows are reachable only through your connection, and in normal operation we do not read them. If you ask for support, we open only what your question needs.

8 more questions: data, security, keys
Where is the data kept, and who processes it?

Servers and nightly backups are in Germany (EU), with Hetzner; Cloudflare runs the network edge, DNS and email routing. Connections are encrypted (HTTPS), and data on disk and in backups is encrypted. If a personal-data breach may affect your account, we tell you without undue delay. Sub-processors

Do you have SOC 2 or ISO 27001?

Not yet. During the beta we do not yet publish an independent penetration-test report, a SOC 2 Type II attestation or an ISO 27001 certificate. Security reports go to security@avokata.com.

How do I rotate a key or export my data?

A key is optional. You see your active keys with avokata_account(action='keys') (the prefix only) and revoke an old one with revoke_api_key; it stops working at once. You export your matter profiles and workflows with export_account_data, and delete the whole account with request_deletion.

Can I search for a person?

No. Avokata does not search for people: rulings are shown as the courts published them, anonymisation included, and you search by legal question, provision, court and date.

How do I know whose words a passage is?

Every excerpt of a ruling is labelled: court's interpretation, court's findings, a party's argument (naming the party), the lower court's reasoning, quoted law or an indirect citation. The labels come from the ruling's structure and phrasing. Lawyers have not confirmed them yet, so they are preliminary.

How fresh is the data?

The coverage page shows each source’s last recorded update and the snapshot’s generation time. Check a document’s edition and validity separately. Each source and its date

Is the connector reliable?

An automated check calls it on a schedule. Over the last 30 days (2026-10-09 to 2026-11-08) it answered 708 of 725 checks (97.7%). This is a monitoring record, not a service-level guarantee.

Does Avokata replace a lawyer?

No. Avokata provides the sources; the lawyer draws the conclusions.