Jobs · Lithuanian advocate, associate or in-house counsel

Weekly matter digest

Every week.

A digest by matter: new practice on the provisions you follow, with case number, date and paragraph, and amendments to them.

The run

One real run of this job against Avokata's live service. The steps are the playbooks it chains; open one to see each tool call, its arguments and what came back.

1. Signed in and read the account

   1 tool call, 0 s

   Tools used

   Avokatawhoami0.1 s

   Call 1: whoami with

   {}

   {"connected": true, "email": "jobs-avokata-weekly-digest@example.test", "via": "bearer", "jurisdiction": "LT", "usage": {"tier": "free", "quotas": {"search_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 20, "remaining": 20}, "paragraph_reads_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 40, "remaining": 40}, "citation_walks_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 10, "remaining": 10}, "validity_checks_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 15, "remaining": 15}, "list_updates_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 5, "remaining": 5}, "matter_profiles_max": {"used": 0, "limit": 1, "remaining": 1}}, "data_delay_hours": 24}, "corpus": {"LT": true, "EU": true}, "data_as_of": "2026-09-23T15:33:40+00:00", "note": "This tier serves data delayed by 24 hou …

2. What is new on my matters?

   1 tool call, 1 s

   Tools used

   Avokataget_workflow0.1 s

   Call 2: get_workflow with

   {"workflow_id": "matter-digest"}

   {"workflow_id": "matter-digest", "title": "What is new on my matters", "one_line": "New court practice on the provisions a matter turns on.", "body": "# What is new on my matters\n\n**Draft. Written by a builder, not a lawyer.** Correct it.\n\nThe one that compounds: a lawyer who has told Dictena what a matter turns on gets told\nwhen the courts say something about it.\n\n## Do this\n\n1. `list_matters` if you do not already have a `matter_id`, then `list_updates` for\n   everything followed or for one matter.\n2. For each ruling: `get_document` for the court, case number and date, then\n   `read_paragraphs` on the paragraph that cites the provision, so the summary is of what\n   the court S …

3. You confirm

   Confirm the provisions each matter should follow.

   Recorded: Checkpoint: vartotoja jau nurodė normas (CK 6.217 ir CK 1.125) bylai „Tiekimo ginčas“ – registruoju jas be papildomo patvirtinimo.

4. Can I still rely on this?

   12 tool calls, 17 s

   Tools used

   Avokataget_workflow0.1 s

   Call 3: get_workflow with

   {"workflow_id": "still-good-law"}

   {"workflow_id": "still-good-law", "title": "Is this still good law?", "one_line": "Take a provision or a ruling and check what has happened to it since.", "body": "# Is this still good law?\n\n**Draft. Written by a builder, not a lawyer.** Correct it.\n\nThe lawyer has a provision or a ruling and wants to know whether she can still rely on it.\n\n## For a provision\n\n1. `check_validity` on the act. In force? Repealed? Which consolidated version governs?\n   **`version_coverage` says whether that last question could be answered at all.** For\n   most acts no version history is held, and a missing version is a gap in our corpus\n   rather than a fact about the law. See the provision-history w …

   Avokatalist_matters0.1 s

   Call 4: list_matters with

   {}

   {"matters": [], "count": 0, "note": "Call get_matter with matter_id or name to read one in full. Pass matter_id to list_updates in a later conversation. This tier serves data delayed by 24 hours. Anything published more recently is not in this answer.", "data_as_of": "2026-09-23T15:33:40+00:00"}

   Avokatabuild_matter_profile1.7 s

   Call 5: build_matter_profile with

   {"name": "Tiekimo ginčas", "provisions": ["CK 6.217", "CK 1.125"], "question": "Sutarties nutraukimas dėl esminio pažeidimo ir ieškinio senaties terminai tiekimo ginče", "jurisdiction": "LT"}

   {"matter_id": 53, "name": "Tiekimo ginčas", "jurisdiction": "LT", "question": "Sutarties nutraukimas dėl esminio pažeidimo ir ieškinio senaties terminai tiekimo ginče", "provisions": ["CK 6.217", "CK 1.125"], "watching": 2, "watching_stored": 2, "watching_note": "`watching` is the number of provisions list_updates can match and report on. `watching_stored` includes labels kept on the matter that the graph cannot follow.", "provision_volumes": [{"provision": "CK 6.217", "citing_rulings": 484}, {"provision": "CK 1.125", "citing_rulings": 1532}], "note": "Provisions listed here are now followed; list_updates reports new practice on them. 2 high-volume: see `high_volume_provisions`. This tier se …

   Avokatalist_updates2.4 s

   Call 6: list_updates with

   {"matter_id": 53, "since": "2026-09-01", "limit": 20}

   {"since": "2026-09-01", "window": {"kind": "explicit", "note": "You asked for a fixed date window; this does not change when the digest last ran."}, "watching": 2, "watching_stored": 2, "watching_note": "`watching` is provisions the citation graph can match. `watching_stored` includes follows that cannot match and appear in `unresolved_watches`.", "count": 6, "rulings": 6, "engagements": 6, "count_note": "`updates` is one entry per JUDGMENT, with every provision of yours it engaged underneath: `count` and `rulings` are both the number of judgments, and `engagements` is how many (provision, paragraph) pairs they carry between them. A judgment that engages two provisions you follow is ONE entr …

   Avokatacheck_validity2.2 s

   Call 7: check_validity with

   {"act_number": "CK"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "title": "Civilinis kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo įstatymas. Civilinis kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "VIII-1864", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.8A39C83848CB", "abbreviation": "CK", "abbreviation_note": "`CK` is Civilinis kodeksas (VIII-1864).", "asked_about": "2026-09-23", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", …

   Avokatacompare_provision_versions0.1 s

   Call 8: compare_provision_versions with

   {"act_number": "CK", "from_date": "2026-09-01", "to_date": "2026-09-23"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "title": "Civilinis kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo įstatymas. Civilinis kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "VIII-1864", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.8A39C83848CB", "abbreviation": "CK", "abbreviation_note": "`CK` is Civilinis kodeksas (VIII-1864).", "compare_from": "2026-09-01", "compare_to": "2026-09-23", "effective_dates_in_w …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.5 s

   Call 9: read_paragraphs with

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2785", "pinpoint": "68", "count": 1}

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2785", "title": "Šiaulių apygardos teismas e2A-764-1051/2026 2026-09-16", "url": "https://liteko.teismai.lt/viesinimas/api/public/publishing/decisionDownload/2785", "returned": 1, "total_units": 1, "next_from_unit": 77, "paragraphs": [{"pinpoint": "e2A-764-1051/2026, 68 p.", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Pirmosios instancijos teismas spręsdamas dėl apelianto prašymo taikyti ieškovo reikalavimams ieškinio senatį, taikė CK 1.125 straipsnio 9 dalies nuostatas ir pripažino, kad ieškinio senaties eiga…", "location": ["konstatuoja"], "text": "68. Pirmosios instancijos teismas spręsdamas dėl apelianto prašymo taikyti ieškovo reikalavimams ieškinio senatį, taikė  …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.5 s

   Call 10: read_paragraphs with

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2570", "pinpoint": "1", "count": 1}

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2570", "title": "Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas eCIK-998/2026 2026-09-14", "url": "https://liteko.teismai.lt/viesinimas/api/public/publishing/decisionDownload/2570", "returned": 1, "total_units": 1, "next_from_unit": 4, "paragraphs": [{"pinpoint": "eCIK-998/2026, 1 p.", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Pirmosios ir apeliacinės instancijos teismai, konstatuodami, kad ginčo sandoris buvo „sudėtinė pirkimo (atlygintinio santykio) dalis“, tačiau palikdami galioti dovanojimo sutartį, pažeidė…", "location": ["nustatė"], "text": "1. Pirmosios ir apeliacinės instancijos teismai, konstatuodami, kad ginčo sandoris buvo „sudėtinė pirkimo (atlygintinio santykio) dalis“ …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.5 s

   Call 11: read_paragraphs with

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2516", "pinpoint": "75", "count": 1}

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2516", "title": "Klaipėdos apygardos teismas e2A-983-440/2026 2026-09-10", "url": "https://liteko.teismai.lt/viesinimas/api/public/publishing/decisionDownload/2516", "returned": 1, "total_units": 1, "next_from_unit": 78, "paragraphs": [{"pinpoint": "e2A-983-440/2026, 75 p.", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Esminio sutarties pažeidimo faktą turi įrodyti šalis, kuri nori pasinaudoti vienašališko sutarties nutraukimo teise. Esminio sutarties pažeidimo įrodinėjimas reiškia, kad turi būti konstatuota, jog…", "location": ["konstatuoja"], "text": "75. Esminio sutarties pažeidimo faktą turi įrodyti šalis, kuri nori pasinaudoti vienašališko sutarties nutraukimo teis …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.4 s

   Call 12: read_paragraphs with

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-3108", "pinpoint": "35", "count": 1}

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-3108", "title": "Lietuvos apeliacinis teismas e2-815-577/2026 2026-09-10", "url": "https://liteko.teismai.lt/viesinimas/api/public/publishing/decisionDownload/3108", "returned": 1, "total_units": 1, "next_from_unit": 37, "paragraphs": [{"pinpoint": "e2-815-577/2026, 35 p.", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Teismas nesutiko su finansinio reikalavimo patvirtinimą ginčijančiomis kreditorėmis, teigiančiomis, kad 66 084,73 Eur finansinis reikalavimas turėtų būti laikomas reikalavimu dėl netesybų, kuriam…", "location": ["nustatė"], "text": "35. Teismas nesutiko su finansinio reikalavimo patvirtinimą ginčijančiomis kreditorėmis, teigiančiomis, kad 66 084,73 Eur fin …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.4 s

   Call 13: read_paragraphs with

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2323", "pinpoint": "13", "count": 1}

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2323", "title": "Vilniaus apygardos teismas e2A-3293-871/2026 2026-09-08", "url": "https://liteko.teismai.lt/viesinimas/api/public/publishing/decisionDownload/2323", "returned": 1, "total_units": 1, "next_from_unit": 20, "paragraphs": [{"pinpoint": "e2A-3293-871/2026, 13 p.", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Pirmosios instancijos teismas nurodė, kad kadangi nuomos mokestis nebuvo mokamas nuo 2019 m. pabaigos, šis pažeidimas yra tęstinis, todėl atsakovas privalo kartu su nuomos mokesčio skola sumokėti ir…", "location": ["nustatė"], "text": "13. Pirmosios instancijos teismas nurodė, kad kadangi nuomos mokestis nebuvo mokamas nuo 2019 m. pabaigos, šis pažeidima …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.5 s

   Call 14: read_paragraphs with

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2872", "pinpoint": "3", "count": 2}

   {"document_id": "lt.liteko-api:v2-2872", "title": "Vilniaus apygardos teismas e2A-1177-580/2026 2026-09-01", "url": "https://liteko.teismai.lt/viesinimas/api/public/publishing/decisionDownload/2872", "returned": 2, "total_units": 2, "next_from_unit": 8, "paragraphs": [{"pinpoint": "e2A-1177-580/2026, 3 p. (1/2 d.)", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Atsakovė Raseinių rajono savivaldybė prašė ieškinį atmesti ir priteisti bylinėjimosi išlaidų atlyginimą. Nurodė, kad:", "location": ["nustatė"], "text": "3. Atsakovė Raseinių rajono savivaldybė prašė ieškinį atmesti ir priteisti bylinėjimosi išlaidų atlyginimą. Nurodė, kad:\n3.1. valstybės pagalbos, apsirūpinant būstu, sistema pradėta kurti 1992 m …

5. Wrote the document from the results

   22 s, no tool calls

What it handed back

These are sources, not a legal conclusion. The lawyer draws the conclusion.

Start it yourself

Connect Avokata to Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor (how), then paste this line followed by your own facts.

Naudok Avokata ir atlik darbą job-weekly-digest: savaitės apžvalga mano byloms, sekamos normos nurodytos žemiau.

Where you decide

• Confirm the provisions each matter should follow.

What it will not do

• Pad the digest with loosely related rulings
• Follow a person: it follows provisions

The scenario

The situation in this run is invented. This is exactly what the assistant was asked, including the job instructions it was given (the job ships to every client as the MCP prompt job-weekly-digest):

Naudok Avokata ir atlik darbą job-weekly-digest: savaitės apžvalga mano byloms, sekamos normos nurodytos žemiau.

The situation (illustrative):
Situacija išgalvota, skirta demonstracijai. Turiu bylą „Tiekimo ginčas“: ji remiasi CK 6.217 (sutarties nutraukimas) ir CK 1.125 (ieškinio senaties terminai). Jei ši byla dar neužregistruota, užregistruok ją su šiomis normomis. Paruošk savaitės apžvalgą: kas naujo nuo 2026 m. rugsėjo 1 d. Normos tokios, prie kontrolinio taško manęs nelauk.

Ši sesija jau prijungta prie Avokata su bandomąja paskyra; pradėk nuo whoami. Atsakyk lietuviškai.

Work it as the job "Weekly matter digest: what changed on the provisions your matters turn on". Read each playbook with get_workflow and follow it, in this order: matter-digest, still-good-law. The job's own instructions follow.

lang: en
# Weekly matter digest: what changed on the provisions your matters turn on

Sources, not advice. **Draft, written by a builder, not a lawyer.** Correct it and it gets replaced.

## When

Once a week. You are running the recurring job: it ends with a digest in Lithuanian grouped by matter, newest first, two lines per new ruling with the case number, the date and the paragraph.

## Run

1. **What is followed, and what is new.** Read `get_workflow('matter-digest')` and follow it: `list_matters`; if nothing is followed yet, ask which provisions the matter turns on and record them with `build_matter_profile`, each as an abbreviation and an article (`CK 6.217`). Read `high_volume_provisions` and `unresolved_watches` and say what they mean. Then `list_updates` for each matter with its `matter_id`; for each new ruling, `get_document` for the court, case number and date, and `read_paragraphs` on the paragraph that cites the provision.
2. **Has any followed provision changed.** Read `get_workflow('still-good-law')` (the provision part): `check_validity` on each followed act. An amendment is news even when no court has spoken.

## Checkpoints

- After step 1's list of followed provisions: she confirms what each matter should follow. If she already gave it, carry on.

## Deliverable

```
Savaitės apžvalga, <data>. Duomenys: <data_as_of>.

<byla>: sekamos normos <...>
  <teismas>, <bylos Nr.>, <data>, <punktas>: ką teismas pasakė, viena eilutė.
  Normų pakeitimai: <...> arba "pakeitimų nėra".

Neatpažintos normos: <unresolved_watches, jei yra>.
```

## Quality

- Case number, date and paragraph on every item, from a tool result in this conversation.
- "Nothing new since <date>" is a valid digest, and says so.
- Followed acts are checked with `check_validity`; `data_as_of` is stated.

## Will not

- Pad the digest with loosely related rulings.
- Follow a person. It follows provisions.

This run is recorded without a person present. At each checkpoint, write one line that starts with "Checkpoint:" stating what you are assuming, then continue. End with the finished work product.

Recorded 2026-09-23. Every tool call, provision, case number, date and quotation on this page is what Avokata's live service returned in that run; nothing was edited except by trimming long tool results. Source file: content/jobs/weekly-digest.run.json.