Darbai · Advokatas, advokato padėjėjas ar įmonės teisininkas

Ar galima remtis šia nutartimi?

Kita šalis cituoja nutartį. Ar ja dar galima remtis?

Vieno puslapio pažyma: ar nutartis turima, instancijų grandinė, kas ją citavo vėliau, ar aktai, kuriais ji remiasi, dar galioja.

Vykdymas

Vienas tikras šio darbo vykdymas veikiančioje Avokata sistemoje. Žingsniai yra darbo eigos, kurias darbas sujungia; atverkite, kad matytumėte kiekvieną iškvietimą, jo argumentus ir atsakymą.

1. Prisijungė ir perskaitė paskyrą

   1 įrankio iškvietimas, 0 s

   Naudoti įrankiai

   Avokatawhoami0.0 s

   Iškvietimas 1: whoami su

   {}

   {"connected": true, "email": "jobs-avokata-rely2@example.test", "via": "bearer", "jurisdiction": "LT", "usage": {"tier": "free", "quotas": {"search_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 20, "remaining": 20}, "paragraph_reads_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 40, "remaining": 40}, "citation_walks_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 10, "remaining": 10}, "validity_checks_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 15, "remaining": 15}, "list_updates_per_day": {"used": 0, "limit": 5, "remaining": 5}, "matter_profiles_max": {"used": 0, "limit": 1, "remaining": 1}}, "data_delay_hours": 24}, "corpus": {"LT": true, "EU": true}, "data_as_of": "2026-09-23T15:33:40+00:00", "note": "This tier serves data delayed by 24 hours. Anyt …

2. Ar galiu remtis šia bylos numeriu?

   7 įrankio iškvietimai, 25 s

   Naudoti įrankiai

   Avokataget_workflow0.0 s

   Iškvietimas 2: get_workflow su

   {"workflow_id": "can-i-rely-on-this"}

   {"workflow_id": "can-i-rely-on-this", "title": "Can I rely on this ruling?", "one_line": "A case number in: later citations, cited acts checked, instance chain named honestly where we cannot automate it.", "body": "# Can I rely on this ruling?\n\n**Draft. Written by a builder, not a lawyer.** Correct it.\n\nThe lawyer names a **case number** and needs to know whether she can still cite that\njudgment: whether later courts have engaged with it, whether the acts it rests on still\nhold, and where the record stops.\n\nThis is the verification workflow Teisora lacks. **Tool chain only**, no opinion on\nwhether she should cite it.\n\n## Do this\n\n1. **Resolve the ruling.** `verify_citation` with …

   Avokataverify_citation0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 3: verify_citation su

   {"citation": "e3K-3-215-421/2024"}

   {"citation": "e3K-3-215-421/2024", "quote_checked": false, "kind": "ruling", "case_no": "e3K-3-215-421/2024", "exists": "held", "document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "court": "Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas", "decided_at": "2024-11-25", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "title": "Nuasmeninta nutartis 2024-11-25 Nr. CB-7097-2-55-3-01939-2014-4", "data_as_of": "2026-09-23T16:28:55+00:00", "data_as_of_sources": ["lt.tar-nutartys"], "note": "This tier serves data delayed by 24 hours. Anything published more recently is not in this answer.", "freshness": {"practice_as_of": "2026-09-23T19:33:16+00:00", "acts_as_of": "2026-0 …

   Avokataget_document1.3 s

   Iškvietimas 4: get_document su

   {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4"}

   {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "kind": "ruling", "jurisdiction": "LT", "title": "Nuasmeninta nutartis 2024-11-25 Nr. CB-7097-2-55-3-01939-2014-4", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "chars": 121277, "units": 128, "contents": [{"pinpoint": "e3K-3-215-421/2024, įžanginė dalis", "kind": "preamble", "heading": null, "chars": 2168, "location": []}, {"pinpoint": "e3K-3-215-421/2024, 1 p.", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Kasacinėje byloje sprendžiama dėl materialiosios teisės normų, reglamentuojančių rangovo ir techninio prižiūrėtojo prievolės atlyginti dėl gaisro kilusią žalą rūšį pagal deliktinės ir sutarčių teisės …

   Avokatacitations_of1.0 s

   Iškvietimas 5: citations_of su

   {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "limit": 60}

   {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "direction": "cites", "count": 50, "resolved_count": 50, "unresolved_count": 0, "citations": [{"from": {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "pinpoint": "e3K-3-215-421/2024, 45 p. (1/3 d.)", "kind": "ruling", "decided_at": "2024-11-25", "court": "Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas", "case_no": "e3K-3-215-421/2024", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4"}, "relation": "cites_act", "to": {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "unit_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB#1024", "pinpoint": "6.5 straipsnis", "act": "Civilinis kodeksas", "case_no": null, "url": "htt …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.5 s

   Iškvietimas 6: read_paragraphs su

   {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "pinpoint": "46 p.", "count": 2}

   {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "title": "Nuasmeninta nutartis 2024-11-25 Nr. CB-7097-2-55-3-01939-2014-4", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "returned": 2, "total_units": 2, "next_from_unit": 51, "paragraphs": [{"pinpoint": "e3K-3-215-421/2024, 46 p. (1/2 d.)", "kind": "paragraph", "heading": "Ieškovė atsiliepimu į kasacinį skundą prašo palikti nepakeistą Lietuvos apeliacinio teismo Civilinių bylų skyriaus teisėjų kolegijos 2024 m. vasario 8 d. nutartį, o atsakovės BĮ Kultūros…", "location": ["nustatė"], "text": "46. Ieškovė atsiliepimu į kasacinį skundą prašo palikti nepakeistą Lietuvos apeliacinio teismo Civi …

   Avokatacited_by2.4 s

   Iškvietimas 7: cited_by su

   {"case_no": "e3K-3-215-421/2024"}

   {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "direction": "cited_by", "matched_on": "case_no", "count": 19, "resolved_count": 19, "unresolved_count": 0, "citations": [{"from": {"document_id": "lt.liteko:7452e010-2418-4301-8ce1-40686b5665c6", "pinpoint": "e2A-523-460/2026, 37 p.", "kind": "ruling", "decided_at": "2026-05-14", "court": "Klaipėdos apygardos teismas", "case_no": "e2A-523-460/2026", "url": "https://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=7452e010-2418-4301-8ce1-40686b5665c6", "times_cited": 2}, "relation": "cites_ruling", "to": {"document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:3ea60044b0cf11ef88c08519262548c4", "unit_id": null, "pinpoint": "e3K-3-215-421/202 …

   Avokatainstance_chain2.5 s

   Iškvietimas 8: instance_chain su

   {"case_no": "e3K-3-215-421/2024"}

   {"matched_on": "case_no", "case_no": "e3K-3-215-421/2024", "proceeding_no": "2-53-3-01643-2010-0", "status": "linkable", "reason": "proceeding_no groups ≥2 instance levels with dates", "joined_via": "both", "finality": "unknown", "finality_note": "Whether an appeal is still open is not recorded in metadata; infer from later instance rulings yourself.", "held_rulings": 45, "instance_levels": ["appeal", "cassation", "first"], "chain": [{"level": "cassation", "court": "Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas", "case_no": "3K-3-283/2012", "proceeding_no": "2-53-3-01643-2010-0", "decided_at": "2012-06-08", "source": "lt.tar-nutartys", "document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:27859c402c1211e69c3d99cd9039168e", "ur …

3. Jūs patvirtinate

   Patvirtinate, kad tai ta nutartis ir tas punktas, kuriuo remiasi kita šalis.

   Užfiksuota: Checkpoint: laikau, kad tai ta nutartis (LAT, 2024-11-25), o cituojama vieta yra 46.1 p. Tai ieškovės argumentas aprašomojoje dalyje, ne teismo motyvas. Tęsiau tikrinimą.

4. Ar dar galiu tuo remtis?

   1 įrankio iškvietimas, 0 s

   Naudoti įrankiai

   Avokataget_workflow2.6 s

   Iškvietimas 9: get_workflow su

   {"workflow_id": "still-good-law"}

   {"workflow_id": "still-good-law", "title": "Is this still good law?", "one_line": "Take a provision or a ruling and check what has happened to it since.", "body": "# Is this still good law?\n\n**Draft. Written by a builder, not a lawyer.** Correct it.\n\nThe lawyer has a provision or a ruling and wants to know whether she can still rely on it.\n\n## For a provision\n\n1. `check_validity` on the act. In force? Repealed? Which consolidated version governs?\n   **`version_coverage` says whether that last question could be answered at all.** For\n   most acts no version history is held, and a missing version is a gap in our corpus\n   rather than a fact about the law. See the provision-history w …

5. Ką šis straipsnis sakė 2019 metais?

   11 įrankio iškvietimų, 22 s

   Naudoti įrankiai

   Avokataget_workflow2.6 s

   Iškvietimas 10: get_workflow su

   {"workflow_id": "provision-history"}

   {"workflow_id": "provision-history", "title": "What did this article say then?", "one_line": "Which consolidated version governed on a date, and what changed around it.", "body": "# What did this article say then?\n\n**Draft. Written by a builder, not a lawyer.** Correct it.\n\nWork is often about a moment in the past: the contract was signed in 2019, the act was\namended in 2021, and the question is what governed then.\n\n## Do this\n\n1. `check_validity` with `on_date` set to the date that matters. **Read\n   `version_coverage` in the answer before you say anything.** It tells you which of\n   four situations you are in, and three of them are not \"there was no version\":\n   - `never_cons …

   Avokatainstance_chain0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 11: instance_chain su

   {"proceeding_no": "2-55-3-01939-2014-4"}

   {"matched_on": "proceeding_no", "case_no": null, "proceeding_no": "2-53-3-01643-2010-0", "status": "linkable", "reason": "proceeding_no groups ≥2 instance levels with dates", "joined_via": "both", "finality": "unknown", "finality_note": "Whether an appeal is still open is not recorded in metadata; infer from later instance rulings yourself.", "held_rulings": 45, "instance_levels": ["appeal", "cassation", "first"], "chain": [{"level": "cassation", "court": "Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas", "case_no": "3K-3-283/2012", "proceeding_no": "2-53-3-01643-2010-0", "decided_at": "2012-06-08", "source": "lt.tar-nutartys", "document_id": "lt.tar-nutartys:27859c402c1211e69c3d99cd9039168e", "url": "https …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 12: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "title": "Civilinis kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo įstatymas. Civilinis kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "VIII-1864", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.8A39C83848CB", "asked_about": "2026-09-23", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "2000-09-06", "in_force_to": null, "status_discriminates": false, "c …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 13: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2E7C18F61454"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2E7C18F61454", "title": "Civilinio proceso kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio proceso kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo įstatymas. Civilinio proceso kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "IX-743", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.2E7C18F61454", "asked_about": "2026-09-23", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "2002-04-06", "in_force_to": null, "status_disc …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 14: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2B866DFF7D43"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2B866DFF7D43", "title": "Baudžiamasis kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo kodekso patvirtinimo ir įsigaliojimo įstatymas. Baudžiamasis kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "VIII-1968", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.2B866DFF7D43", "asked_about": "2026-09-23", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "2000-10-25", "in_force_to": null, "status_discriminates": false, "conditi …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 15: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.F31E79DEC55D"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.F31E79DEC55D", "title": "Lietuvos Respublikos statybos įstatymas", "act_number": "I-1240", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.F31E79DEC55D", "asked_about": "2026-09-23", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "1996-09-01", "in_force_to": null, "status_discriminates": false, "conditional_force": "1996-09-01", "governing_version": {"version_id": "oTFbLJicAa", "valid_from": "2025-11-01", "valid_to": null, "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.F31E79DEC55D/oTFbLJicAa"}, "versions_held": 69, "version_coverage": {"status": "named", "held": 69, "earliest_held": "1997-06-26", "latest_held": "2025-11-01"}, "note": "The  …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 16: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "on_date": "2024-11-25"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "title": "Civilinis kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo įstatymas. Civilinis kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "VIII-1864", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.8A39C83848CB", "asked_about": "2024-11-25", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "2000-09-06", "in_force_to": null, "status_discriminates": false, "c …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 17: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2E7C18F61454", "on_date": "2024-11-25"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2E7C18F61454", "title": "Civilinio proceso kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio proceso kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo įstatymas. Civilinio proceso kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "IX-743", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.2E7C18F61454", "asked_about": "2024-11-25", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "2002-04-06", "in_force_to": null, "status_disc …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 18: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2B866DFF7D43", "on_date": "2024-11-25"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.2B866DFF7D43", "title": "Baudžiamasis kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo kodekso patvirtinimo ir įsigaliojimo įstatymas. Baudžiamasis kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "act_number": "VIII-1968", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.2B866DFF7D43", "asked_about": "2024-11-25", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "2000-10-25", "in_force_to": null, "status_discriminates": false, "conditi …

   Avokatacheck_validity0.1 s

   Iškvietimas 19: check_validity su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.F31E79DEC55D", "on_date": "2024-11-25"}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.F31E79DEC55D", "title": "Lietuvos Respublikos statybos įstatymas", "act_number": "I-1240", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.F31E79DEC55D", "asked_about": "2024-11-25", "state": "in_force", "register_status": "galioja", "in_force_from": "1996-09-01", "in_force_to": null, "status_discriminates": false, "conditional_force": "1996-09-01", "governing_version": {"version_id": "qFAevnsSco", "valid_from": "2024-11-02", "valid_to": "2024-12-31", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.F31E79DEC55D/qFAevnsSco"}, "versions_held": 69, "version_coverage": {"status": "named", "held": 69, "earliest_held": "1997-06-26", "latest_held": "2025-11-01"}, "note …

   Avokataread_paragraphs0.3 s

   Iškvietimas 20: read_paragraphs su

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "article": "1.125", "count": 1}

   {"document_id": "lt.e-tar:TAR.8A39C83848CB", "title": "Civilinis kodeksas", "register_title": "Lietuvos Respublikos civilinio kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo įstatymas. Civilinis kodeksas", "title_note": "The register publishes this code inside the statute that enacted it. `title` is the code, which is what a citation names; `register_title` is the document as e-TAR titles it, and its own articles are also in this file.", "url": "https://e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.8A39C83848CB", "version": {"is": "in_force_now", "version_id": "RQqxysUdFp", "valid_from": "2026-04-01", "valid_from_scope": "act_consolidated", "note": "The register carries this act as in force, and this i …

6. Parašė dokumentą iš rezultatų

   46 s, be įrankių iškvietimų

Ką grąžino

Tai šaltiniai, ne teisinė išvada. Išvadą daro teisininkas.

Pradėkite patys

Prijunkite Avokata prie Claude, ChatGPT ar Cursor (kaip), tada įklijuokite šią eilutę ir savo faktus.

Naudok Avokata ir atlik darbą job-rely-on-ruling: ar galima remtis žemiau nurodyta nutartimi?

Kur sprendžiate jūs

• Patvirtinate, kad tai ta nutartis ir tas punktas, kuriuo remiasi kita šalis.

Ko šis darbas nedaro

• Nedaro išvados, kad nutartimi galima ar negalima remtis.
• Nesprendžia apie įsiteisėjimą iš instancijų grandinės.
• Neskaito vėlesnių nutarčių už jus; pateikia jų sąrašą.

Situacija

Situacija šiame vykdyme išgalvota. Štai tiksliai tai, ko buvo paprašyta asistento, kartu su darbo instrukcijomis (darbas visiems klientams pasiekiamas kaip MCP raginimas job-rely-on-ruling):

Naudok Avokata ir atlik darbą job-rely-on-ruling: ar galima remtis žemiau nurodyta nutartimi?

The situation (illustrative):
Situacija išgalvota, skirta demonstracijai. Kita šalis ieškinio senaties ginče remiasi Lietuvos Aukščiausiojo Teismo 2024 m. lapkričio 25 d. nutartimi civilinėje byloje Nr. e3K-3-215-421/2024, jos dalimi apie CK 1.125 straipsnio 8 dalį. Ar galime remtis šia nutartimi, ar ją galima nuginčyti? Prie kontrolinio taško manęs nelauk: tai ta nutartis.

Ši sesija jau prijungta prie Avokata su bandomąja paskyra; pradėk nuo whoami. Atsakyk lietuviškai.

Work it as the job "Can I rely on this ruling: a one-page reliance note". Read each playbook with get_workflow and follow it, in this order: can-i-rely-on-this, still-good-law, provision-history. The job's own instructions follow.

lang: en
# Can I rely on this ruling: a one-page reliance note

Sources, not advice. **Draft, written by a builder, not a lawyer.** Correct it and it gets replaced.

## When

Opposing counsel has cited a ruling. You are running a whole job: it ends with a one-page reliance note in Lithuanian. Work in Lithuanian unless she writes in English.

## Run

1. **Resolve and read the ruling.** Read `get_workflow('can-i-rely-on-this')` and do its steps 1 and 2: `verify_citation` with the case number, or `search_practice` with the exact number. If it is not held, say so and stop: zero later citations of a ruling we do not hold means nothing. Keep the court, `decided_at` and `document_id`. `read_paragraphs` on the paragraph relied on, if one was named, by its number; ask for a `ruling_part` only when the ruling's structure lists it, because many published rulings are not split into parts.
2. **Later practice and the instance chain.** Steps 3 and 6 of the same playbook: `cited_by(case_no=...)` and `instance_chain(case_no=...)`. Report `rulings_total`, the newest citing rulings with dates, and which instances are held.
3. **The foundations.** Read `get_workflow('still-good-law')` and `get_workflow('provision-history')`. `citations_of` on the ruling, then `check_validity` on each act it cites; where an act changed after the ruling, `check_validity` with `on_date` set to the ruling's date, to say which version the court read.

## Checkpoints

- After step 1: she confirms this is the ruling and the paragraph. Say back the court, the date and the paragraph found.

## Deliverable

```
Pažyma: ar galima remtis nutartimi <bylos Nr.>
<teismas>, <data>. Duomenys: <data_as_of>.

1. Ar nutartis turima: ir kuris punktas cituojamas.
2. Instancijų grandinė: kas turima, ko trūksta.
3. Vėlesnė praktika: <kiek> nutarčių ją cituoja; naujausios su bylų Nr. ir datomis.
4. Pagrindai: kiekvienas cituotas aktas ir jo galiojimas; kas pasikeitė nuo nutarties.
5. Ko Avokata nefiksuoja: ar vėlesnis teismas pritarė, atribojo ar nukrypo.
```

## Quality

- Every case number, date, count and act comes from a tool result in this conversation.
- Every cited act is checked with `check_validity`.
- States what the citation graph does not record, and `data_as_of`.

## Will not

- Conclude that the ruling is, or is not, good law.
- Infer finality from the instance chain.
- Read the later rulings for her; it hands her the list.

This run is recorded without a person present. At each checkpoint, write one line that starts with "Checkpoint:" stating what you are assuming, then continue. End with the finished work product.

Užfiksuota 2026-09-23. Kiekvienas įrankio iškvietimas, norma, bylos numeris, data ir citata šiame puslapyje yra tai, ką grąžino veikianti Avokata sistema tame vykdyme; niekas neredaguota, tik sutrumpinti ilgi įrankių atsakymai. Šaltinio failas: content/jobs/rely-on-ruling.run.json.